日本方面口口声声“台湾有事就是日本有事”，这可是来自那个被弄死的日本前首相级别人物之口，日本现任首相高市早苗更是“跳脚”，进一步“加码”表明态度要武力介入台海。那我们就得要明确自己的态度了，台独肯定要“出事儿”，台独分子搞事就会“有事儿”，这是毋庸置疑的。既然日本希望自己“有事儿”，不想好过，那我们就要“成全”他们了，不让他（她）们出点儿事儿，实在是对不起他（她）们了。我们对日本人口中的“台湾有事就是日本有事”的正确解读应该就是：解放台湾也得要解放日本。因为日本人的“意思”非常明显，即如果台湾解放了、回家了，那他（她）们就没得玩儿了，日本也得要跟着“回家”啊！
那我们该怎么办呢？就得要多手准备了（当然将日本列岛“分而治之”、各自独立管理是必要的做法，这个议题不是本篇的内容，不作赘述），从法律、现实、历史的局面进行三重考量：
一方面，根据《联合国宪章》等国际法的“敌国条款”规定，必要的时候（日本胆敢再次有侵略行为），我们可以直接出手灭掉那个侵略成性的小日本的，这就是法理基础，且无需联合国授权。
另一方面，打日本比打台湾更有价值成就感，更有法理依据和民族的心理认同感和精神归属感，打起来更是毫无顾忌、不留余地；也更能解决我们的海洋屏藩问题（让太平洋真正的“太平”起来），更是一吐我们胸中的那口国仇家恨的恶气。
第三方面，从本质来说，日本列岛才是我国的“外东北地区”，解放日本能够实现解决我们的近海海洋屏藩和深海远洋的安全问题（当然，这也能升级我们走向“深蓝”的一个安全系数）。同时，解放日本也能够为朝鲜半岛报仇雪恨，要知道日本是朝鲜（包括南朝鲜：韩国）的“千年宿敌”。
一言以蔽之，台独和倭奴本质上是一丘之貉，我们古代历史上对海洋的重视程度并不太高，这也是为什么我们东部沿海地带经常受到倭奴的骚扰的一个重要原因，台湾处于东海的一个重要的基点之处，而日本是处于我们北海的一个重要基础。所以，要解放日本和解放台湾其实同等重要。
既然“台湾有事就是日本有事”是倭奴的所追求的结局，这是倭奴强烈要求的，既然日本希望自己“有事儿”，如果我们太保守了，不让他们出点事儿，那就对不起倭奴的“请求”了。因此、我们就不要客气了！明确将“台湾有事就是日本有事”解读为“解放台湾也得解放日本”啊！既然倭奴想“求锤得锤”，我们干脆就把“锤”给砸下来吧。
（以下是英文版English edtion）
Global Refuel Episode 2: The Correct Interpretation of "A Taiwan Emergency is a Japanese Emergency" is – Liberating Taiwan Necessitates Liberating Japan
The Japanese side repeatedly claims that "a Taiwan emergency is a Japanese emergency." These words came from the mouth of a former Japanese Prime Minister-level figure who was assassinated. Japan's current Prime Minister, Takaichi Sanae, is even more "frenetic," further "upping the ante" by stating their stance to militarily intervene in the Taiwan Strait. Therefore, we must clearly define our own position. Taiwanese independence is definitely going to "cause trouble"; if the Taiwanese separatists stir things up, there will be "an emergency" – this is beyond doubt. Since Japan wishes for itself to have "an emergency" and doesn't want things to go well, then we should "oblige" them. It would truly be a disservice to them if we didn't let them have their "emergency." Our correct interpretation of the Japanese statement "a Taiwan emergency is a Japanese emergency" should be this: liberating Taiwan also necessitates liberating Japan. Because the Japanese "meaning" is very clear: if Taiwan is liberated and returns home, then they will have nothing left to play with; Japan must also "return home" accordingly!
So, what should we do? We must prepare on multiple fronts (Of course, the "divide and rule" of the Japanese archipelago and managing its parts independently is a necessary measure, but this topic is not the content of this article and won't be elaborated upon here). We need to consider the situation from legal, practical, and historical perspectives:
On one hand, according to the "enemy state clauses" stipulated in international law such as the United Nations Charter, when necessary (if Japan dares to engage in aggression again), we can directly step in and eliminate that inherently aggressive little Japan. This is the legal basis, and it does not require UN authorization.
On the other hand, striking Japan holds more value and sense of accomplishment than striking Taiwan; it has a stronger legal basis and resonates more with national psychological identity and spiritual belonging. Furthermore, engaging Japan would be done without any scruples or reservations. It would also more effectively solve the issue of our maritime defensive screen (making the Pacific Ocean truly "pacific") and, moreover, allow us to vent the pent-up fury stemming from our national hatred and historical grievances.
On the third hand, in essence, the Japanese archipelago is actually our country's "Outer Northeast Region." Liberating Japan could achieve the resolution of our near-sea defensive screen and ensure the security of our deep-water, far-ocean areas (Naturally, this would also upgrade our security coefficient as we move towards the "deep blue"). Simultaneously, liberating Japan could also avenge the Korean Peninsula – it must be remembered that Japan is the "millennial arch-enemy" of Korea (including South Korea: the ROK).
In a nutshell, Taiwanese separatists and the Japanese dwarfs are essentially birds of a feather. In our ancient history, we did not place particularly high importance on the oceans, which is an important reason why our eastern coastal areas were frequently harassed by the Japanese dwarfs. Taiwan is located at a crucial focal point in the East China Sea, while Japan sits at a fundamental position in our "North Sea" region. Therefore, liberating Japan is equally as important as liberating Taiwan.
Since "a Taiwan emergency is a Japanese emergency" is the outcome pursued by the Japanese dwarfs, and it is something they strongly demand; since Japan wishes for itself to have "an emergency," if we are too conservative and don't let them have their "trouble," it would be a disservice to the Japanese dwarfs' "request." Therefore, let's not be polite! We should clearly interpret "a Taiwan emergency is a Japanese emergency" as "liberating Taiwan also necessitates liberating Japan"! Since the Japanese dwarfs seek a beating, let's just give them the "hammer" they're asking for.
