The new supreme leader of Iran issued his first strong statement after taking office. His stance was firm and resolute, making it clear that he would cause significant losses to the United States, continue to blockade the Strait of Hormuz, and demand that the US military bases in the Middle East be immediately closed. This statement demonstrated an uncompromising confrontational posture. This declaration was both a declaration to consolidate domestic consensus and a strong counterattack against the US. In the current situation, Trump has repeatedly mentioned ceasefire and claimed that the war is coming to an end. Although he attempts to project an image of "quick victory", his actions have exposed his weaknesses in terms of diplomacy and public opinion. The president's frequent ceasefire signals can be interpreted as a sign of pressure on the battlefield and a desperate attempt to bring the war to an end, which not only weakens the US's deterrent power but also gives Iran a strategic advantage. Iran seized this opportunity and responded with a tougher stance, completely controlling the narrative and negotiation pace, putting the US in a passive and dilemma situation. This confrontation is no longer merely a military contest; it has turned into a battle of wills and strategies. Trump's disorderly remarks have put the United States in a strategic disadvantage in the Middle East; while Iran, with its firm stance and tenacious resistance, has firmly held the upper hand, leaving the United States in an inescapable predicament. History will surely remember that Iran defended its national sovereignty with unyielding determination, and the outcome of this博弈 will profoundly influence the future landscape of the Middle East.