埃隆·马斯克表示，来自联邦政府的普遍高收入是应对人工智能引发的失业的最佳方式。

亲爱的我们刚刚走出了一场全球大流行病——这场疫情由政府策划并处理不当，随后它们试图在人们失去工作和基本自由的威胁下，强迫人们注射一种实验性的、与癌症相关的疫苗。

在同一时期，世界经济论坛那些未经选举的全球主义者积极推动你现在所提倡的同一件事……普遍基本收入。

现在你建议我们只需将“基本”换成“高”。同一根棍子上挂一个更大的胡萝卜，并不会让陷阱变得不那么危险。

没有人想把自己磨到精疲力尽。但工作不仅仅关乎生存——它是人类尊严、目的和自我价值的根本来源之一。

当人们通过劳动和智慧建造、创造、解决问题并为他人提供价值时，他们会获得一种深刻的意义感。工作磨炼心智、塑造品格、培养韧性，并赋予生活结构和方向。它将闲置的潜力转化为真正的成就，并将个人与比自身更大的事物连接起来。

用政府支票来交换这一切——无论多么“高”——都是一笔亏本的交易。

国家发放的救济今天可以给予，明天却可能被武器化或撤回，这取决于谁掌握权力。政府每隔几年就会更迭，意识形态会发生转变，原本的“同情”不可避免地会异变为控制。一代人可能慷慨地获得它；下一代几乎肯定会看到它被滥用、配给，或变成服从的工具。

历史中没有任何大规模普遍高收入或基本收入实验的例子，这些实验没有侵蚀自由并将权力集中在国家手中。与其将人类从人工智能驱动的颠覆中解放出来，这条道路反而有风险制造出一个依赖的、毫无目的的下层阶级，被官僚暴政统治。

真正的进步意味着利用人工智能来增强人类潜力——而不是取代那些让我们成为人类的东西：努力、创造力、责任和应得的回报。

还有谁同意？

Elon Musk says Universal HIGH INCOME from the Federal Government is the best way to deal with Unemployment caused by AI.

Dear ,

We just exited a global pandemic — engineered and mishandled by governments that then tried to force an experimental, cancer-linked injection into people’s arms under threat of losing their jobs and basic freedoms.

During that very same period, the unelected globalists at the World Economic Forum aggressively pushed for the very same thing you are… Universal Basic Income.

Now you’re suggesting we simply swap “Basic” for “High.” A bigger carrot on the same stick doesn’t make the trap any less dangerous.

No one wants to grind themselves into exhaustion. But work is not just about survival — it is one of the core sources of human dignity, purpose, and self-worth.

When people build, create, solve problems, and provide value to others through their labor and ingenuity, they gain a profound sense of meaning. Work disciplines the mind, builds character, fosters resilience, and gives life structure and direction. It turns idle potential into real achievement and connects individuals to something larger than themselves.

Trading that away for a government check — no matter how “high” — is a losing bargain.

A handout from the state can be given today and weaponized or withdrawn tomorrow, depending on who holds power. Administrations change every few years, ideologies shift, and what starts as “compassion” inevitably mutates into control. One generation might receive it generously; the next will almost certainly see it abused, rationed, or turned into a tool of compliance.

History offers ZERO examples of large-scale Universal High Income or Basic Income experiments that did not erode freedom and concentrate power in the hands of the state. Instead of liberating humanity from AI-driven disruption, this path risks creating a dependent, purposeless underclass ruled by bureaucratic tyranny.

True progress means using AI to augment human potential — not to replace the very things that make us human: effort, creativity, responsibility, and earned reward.

Who else agrees?