如果你认为(P)HARMA很糟糕等到你深入牙科兔子洞的时候……
报告记录了牙医(尤其是在企业/私募股权支持的连锁机构中)为了达到收入目标而推销不必要的治疗,如牙冠、补牙、深度清洁或拔牙以植入种植体。健康的牙齿被拔掉以换取盈利的种植体;儿童接受过度治疗。诉讼和调查(例如针对连锁机构)突显了这一点。
私募股权的影响不断扩大,优先考虑数量和生产而非保守治疗。前员工描述了钻孔或治疗边缘问题的压力。
这些治疗费用高昂,二诊意见差异巨大,预防护理有时被干预措施所掩盖。
这些反映了制药业的利润动机和过度处方问题。
最大的一个。1920年代的旧研究(局灶感染理论)声称它们通过滞留的细菌/毒素引起全身性疾病(如关节炎、癌症等)。
氟化物:过度暴露会导致牙科氟中毒(牙釉质斑点,现在在美国约1/3的儿童中常见),研究将较高的产前/儿童期水平与适度的智商下降联系起来。
汞合金补牙:它们会释放微量蒸汽,尤其是在咀嚼时。监管机构(FDA、ADA)表示,对一般人群中大多数人没有明确危害。敏感个体或肾脏问题患者可能不同。除非必要,否则不推荐移除(它可能会暂时增加暴露)。现在常见的替代品如复合材料。
其他话题(智齿拔除、正畸、“生物”牙科)因案而异。有些拔除是不必要的;其他则能预防真正的问题。
ThrowbackThursday
网页链接
IF YOU THINK (P)HARMAIS BADWAIT UNTIL YOU GO DOWN THE DENTISTRYRABBIT HOLE…
Reports document dentists (especially in corporate/private equity-backed chains) pushing unnecessary procedures like crowns, fillings, deep cleanings, or extractions for implants to hit revenue targets. Healthy teeth get pulled for profitable implants; kids get excessive work. Lawsuits and investigations (e.g., against chains) highlight this.
Private equity influence has grown, prioritizing volume and production over conservative care. Ex-employees describe pressure to drill or treat borderline issues.
Procedures are expensive, second opinions vary wildly, and preventive care sometimes gets overshadowed by intervention.
These mirror pharma’s profit motives and overprescription problems.
The big one. Old 1920s research (focal infection theory) claimed they cause systemic disease (arthritis, cancer, etc.) via trapped bacteria/toxins.
Fluoride: The excessive exposure causes dental fluorosis (enamel spots, now common in ~1/3 of US kids), and studies link higher prenatal/childhood levels to modest IQ drops.
Mercury amalgam fillings: They release tiny amounts of vapor, especially when chewing. Regulatory bodies (FDA, ADA) say no clear harm for most people in the general population. Sensitive individuals or those with kidney issues might differ. Removal isn’t recommended unless necessary (it can spike exposure temporarily). Alternatives like composites are common now.
Other topics (wisdom teeth extractions, orthodontics, “biological” dentistry) vary case-by-case. Some extractions are unnecessary; others prevent real problems.
ThrowbackThursday
网页链接
网页链接
