DC娱乐网

《英国医学杂志》(The BMJ),世界上顶尖的医学期刊之一,发表了Willman的一篇报告,解释称美国卫生官员部署了一个有缺陷的数据挖掘算法来追踪mRNA新冠疫苗的安全性,无视了关于其失败的内部警告,并边缘化了试图修复它的科学家。令人难以置信的是,辉瑞和现代疫苗通常被用作彼此的背景基线,因此如果 ​

《英国医学杂志》(The BMJ),世界上顶尖的医学期刊之一,发表了Willman的一篇报告,解释称美国卫生官员部署了一个有缺陷的数据挖掘算法来追踪mRNA新冠疫苗的安全性,无视了关于其失败的内部警告,并边缘化了试图修复它的科学家。令人难以置信的是,辉瑞和现代疫苗通常被用作彼此的背景基线,因此如果两者都引起类似问题——比如心肌炎——就会显得没有问题。这就像许多非新冠疫苗不被测试对照安慰剂,而是对照早期版本/选项一样。明知他们的药物警戒系统很糟糕,当局仍继续声称这些疫苗是安全的。链接在下方。

The BMJ, one of the world’s top medical journals, has published a report by Willman explaining that US health officials deployed a flawed data-mining algorithm to track mRNA COVID-19 vaccine safety, ignored internal warnings about its failure, and sidelined scientists who attempted to fix it. Incredibly, the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines were typically used as the background baseline for each other, so if both caused similar issues - like myocarditis - it appeared that there was no problem. It’s like how so many non-COVID vaccines aren’t tested against placebo, but against earlier versions/options. Knowing that their pharmacovigilance sucked, the authorities continued to maintain that the jabs were safe. Link below.

Link: 网页链接