太平洋足够大，容得下中美两国！
但“东海不是很宽”，不一定容得下日本这个下等小国。
当军事专家兼评论员的宋忠平先生对日本发出“东海不是很宽”的警告之时，不知道日本有没有意识的到其全日本领土都会成“战场”的可能，不知道那个叫做高市早苗的日本女首相有没有在睡觉的时候被黑夜的“梦魇之幕”惊醒？
夜郎自大说的是日本，蚍蜉撼树、不自量力说的也是日本。只可惜日本并不明白自己的“斤两”，还在做着蹬鼻子上脸的恶行。日本通过“卖身”的可耻行为坐在了西方国家G7的桌子边上，就被“笑贫不笑娼”了？日本自以为傍上了美国的大粗腿，舔上了美国的大屁股，就可以成为“发达国家俱乐部”成员了？殊不知、其就是美国的一条玩物狗而已。如果条件具备，如果我们想要，可以随意发动对日本的灭国之战，随时都可以打死美国的这条“日本狗”。
日本一直自以为是的认为其会成为我们的一盘菜，但我们从来没有正眼瞧得上这个殖民地的下等小国。我们所有的准备，所进行的“备战备荒”的箭头都指向了日本这个奴隶背后的洋主子“洋爷”——美国。有句话说得非常好：“打狗也得看主人”，背后之意就是打狗也得要防着狗的主人。毕竟我们和日本这条狗的主人——美国，还有千丝万缕的各种政治经济军事的交易往来，也不能说断就断。
如果按照资本主义国家的那一套做派，我们完全可以在必要的时候考虑和美国达成交易，进而私下里分区军事占领或瓜分日本，达到“共治共管”日本的初级目的。记住这仅仅是第一步。
美国这个时候，可以邀请我们和他们一起“共治共管”日本，就像当年的奥巴马政府那样，力邀我们和美国一起共治世界的那样（西方媒体随即就以G2称呼中美）。我们对共治世界没有兴趣，但对“共治共管”日本的兴趣，应该还是有的。
下一步、一旦美国被其国内的债务拖垮了，美利坚联邦解体了，那么、我们可以在第一时间有效地全面接管日本、控制日本、分割日本。毕竟120多个美国军事基地及其先进武器落入日本并不是一个好的兆头。美国走了，我们得学会接手如何奴役日本的这项“工作”。
所以，太平洋足够大，能够容得下中美两国包括中美“共治共管”日本，也能够容得下中美俄演绎“大三国”故事。但“东海不是很宽”，日本非得要作死，那么、就彻底一点儿，将其“打包”送走，渣儿都不要留。其实，对于日本来说，太平洋也不是很宽，美国容不下日本，所以将“狗链子”拴得很紧；俄罗斯也容不下日本，时不时地踢上几脚。这就是日本这个奴才的命，活该挨揍。
（以下是英文版 English edtion）
“Global Refuel”, Episode 4: Can China and the United States Jointly “Co-manage” Japan at This Stage?
The Pacific Ocean is vast enough to accommodate both China and the United States! However, the "East China Sea is not very wide," and it may not necessarily accommodate a lower-tier small country like Japan.
When military expert and commentator Mr. Song Zhongping issued the warning to Japan that the "East China Sea is not very wide," one wonders if Japan has realized the possibility that its entire territory could become a "battlefield." One also wonders if that Japanese female politician, Ms. Takaichi Sanae, has been jolted awake by the "curtain of nightmares" in the dark of night?
The phrase "Yelang thinks too highly of itself" refers to Japan, and "an ant trying to shake a tree—overestimating its own strength" also describes Japan. It is a pity that Japan does not understand its own "weight" and continues to engage in despicable behavior, overstepping its bounds. Japan has shamelessly secured a seat at the table of the Western G7 by "selling itself," but does that mean it is now "praised for wealth rather than shamed for dishonor"? Japan thinks that by clinging to America's thick thigh and licking America's backside, it has become a member of the "club of developed countries"? Little does it know that it is merely America's plaything—a dog. If conditions permit, if we so desire, we could launch a war to annihilate Japan at any time, and at any moment, we could put down this "Japanese dog" of the United States.
Japan has always arrogantly believed that it could become a dish on our plate, but we have never deigned to cast a glance at this lower-tier small country—a colony. All our preparations, our "preparations for war and famine," are aimed at Japan's master behind the slave—the "Western master," the United States. There is a saying that goes very well: "If you beat a dog, you must also face its master." The underlying meaning is that when beating a dog, one must also be wary of its owner. After all, we and the United States—the owner of this dog—still have countless political, economic, and military exchanges, which cannot be severed overnight.
If we were to follow the practices of capitalist countries, we could, when necessary, consider reaching a deal with the United States to jointly militarily occupy or partition Japan, achieving the preliminary goal of "co-governing and co-managing" Japan. Remember, this is only the first step.
At this point, the United States could invite us to "co-govern and co-manage" Japan together, just as the Obama administration once strongly invited us to co-govern the world (Western media subsequently referred to China and the U.S. as G2). We have no interest in co-governing the world, but we might have some interest in "co-governing and co-managing" Japan.
The next step: once the United States is dragged down by its domestic debt and the American federation collapses, we can, at the first opportunity, effectively take over Japan in its entirety, control Japan, and partition Japan. After all, the presence of over 120 U.S. military bases and their advanced weapons in Japan is not a good sign. If the United States leaves, we must learn to take over the "work" of enslaving Japan.
Therefore, the Pacific Ocean is vast enough to accommodate both China and the United States, including their "co-governance and co-management" of Japan, and it is also vast enough to accommodate the "great power triangle" story of China, the United States, and Russia. However, the "East China Sea is not very wide." If Japan insists on seeking its own destruction, then let it be thorough—let it be "packaged up" and sent away, without leaving even a trace.
In fact, for Japan, the Pacific Ocean is not very wide either. The United States cannot accommodate Japan, which is why it keeps the "dog leash" tightly fastened. Russia also cannot accommodate Japan, occasionally giving it a kick. This is the fate of a lackey like Japan—it deserves to be beaten.
